Affiliates - etc

 23AD
 p2pblocklist
 fileforum
 utc
 cpunk

  nex
  goldrake
 ms
 
   MoonStorm
   lemona
Wbench
    lemonc
xslayradio64
freegary
  nss23
  faceshit
don 

ADSponsor

powered_by.png, 1 kB

Home arrow News arrow Internet arrow Honeypot 2k9 Report
Honeypot 2k9 Report Print E-mail
Written by MK23_Sysop   
Monday, 28 December 2009
Article Index
Honeypot 2k9 Report
Page 2
>Project Honeypot looks at he number of compromised machines operating within the country divided by the number of security professionals operating in the country. This gives us a relative IT security score. As a proxy for the number of security professionals we used members in Project Honey Pot. Here are the results:
Best IT Security
#1 Finland
#2 Canada
#3 Belgium
#4 Australia
#5 Netherlands
#6 United States
#7 Norway
#8 New Zeland
#9 Sweden
#10 Estonia
Worst IT Security
#1 China
#2 Azerbaijan
#3 South Korea
#4 Colombia
#5 Macedonia
#6 Turkey
#7 Viet Nam
#8 Kazakhstan
#9 Macau
#10 Brazil

Because sending spam remains the primary use of bots, Project Honey Pot has a unique perspective on bot network activity. Since 2004, active bots have grown at a compound annual growth rate of more than 378%. In other words, the number of bots has nearly quadrupled ever year. In 2009, you could find nearly 400,000 active bots engaged in malicious activity on any given day with several million active over the course of any month.

Fortunately, Project Honey Pot's coverage of active botnets has grown over time at an even faster rate. In 2006, we saw less than 20% of the active bots on any given day. Today we see more than 80%.

Project Honey Pot's Bot Coverage

While tracking bots has become a critical aspect of Project Honey Pot, we remain curious where the spammers are actually located. To get at this information it's critical to look at spammer activities that are not laundered through bots. While sending email spam can easily be done in parallel (i.e., 1 million machines can send one message each) harvesting email addresses, which involves crawling web pages, cannot. This makes sense: crawling without centralized command and control will result in a lot of crawling of the same popular pages over and over again.



Last Updated ( Thursday, 31 December 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >
© 2012 Nexus23 Labs